An Arizona father of four Higley Unified School District students made headlines by taking a bold stand against the district’s new dress code policy.

Ira Latham, in an unconventional move, stripped down to shorts and a crop top during a school board meeting to voice his concerns about what he believes is an overly lenient dress code. His actions, while grabbing the attention of many, ultimately failed to sway the school board, who voted 3 to 2 in favor of the updated policy.

Latham’s dramatic protest was fueled by his belief that the revised dress code policy lacked the necessary guidelines to maintain appropriate attire within the school premises.

The previous dress code, which had remained largely unchanged for over two decades, prohibited students from exposing their chest, abdomen, or midriff. However, the updated policy significantly narrowed its scope, focusing solely on restricting students from exposing their underwear.

“Before they had some guidance, but now they have no guidance. It’s just, ‘Kids, cover your underwear,'” Latham lamented during his passionate address to the school board.

Latham’s actions may have been theatrical, but his underlying concerns were shared by a faction of parents and board members who opposed the revised dress code. They argued that the new policy failed to adequately address the issue of appropriate attire for students and hoped to revisit the issue in the future.

Despite Latham’s fervent display, the school board was unmoved, with three members voting in favor of the updated policy. Tiffany Shultz, the governing board president, described Latham’s protest as a “stunt that is great for news” but maintained that it had no impact on the board’s decision.

Shultz emphasized the importance of allowing parents and families to decide what is appropriate for their children within the bounds of the dress code. She also highlighted that the updated policy brought Higley Unified School District in line with the dress code policies of other area schools.

“We want teachers to be teaching and not having to waste time measuring a girl’s shirt or making a girl feel uncomfortable,” Shultz stated. “To summarize, this was to allow families to decide, move our policies forward and allow teachers to concentrate on teaching.”

Amanda Wade, another board member who voted in favor of the new policy, echoed Shultz’s sentiments. She expressed respect for the concerns of some parents but suggested that Latham’s choice of protest method missed the mark.

“While I respect and understand there are some parents who are angry with the policy, the choice of one parent at the board meeting to wear clothes to express his displeasure with the policy felt like it missed the mark,” Wade commented.

However, dissenting voices were not entirely absent within the board itself. Anna Van Hoek, a board member who voted against the new dress code, voiced her strong disagreement with the policy’s direction.

“The fact that we have adults advocating for children to have less clothing on is absurd to me,” Van Hoek asserted.

For parents and board members who opposed the revised policy, Latham’s protest served as a poignant reminder that not all concerns were being heard. They remained hopeful that the issue would be revisited in the future, providing an opportunity to address the broader concerns about appropriate attire and maintaining a conducive learning environment for all students.

In the end, Ira Latham’s unconventional protest may not have swayed the school board’s decision, but it certainly ignited a conversation about dress codes, appropriate attire, and the role of parents and schools in shaping the guidelines that govern students’ appearances.

As the Higley Unified School District moves forward with its new dress code policy, the voices of concerned parents and board members continue to advocate for a more comprehensive and balanced approach to maintaining appropriate attire within the school environment. The debate over dress codes is far from over, and the ongoing dialogue is a testament to the passionate engagement of parents and stakeholders in their children’s education.


Join the Discussion

COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
More Stuff